Objective List Theory

Consider theories of goodness and intrinsic value of the sort we have been discussing in class through today.  Which theory is most defensible, and why?

Objective List Theory

Considering the theories of goodness and intrinsic value, I personally feel that the Objective list theory is the most defendable. With the objective list theory one of the main parts of it are all the basic needs of that person are met. Looking at the list we came up with in class of equality, desert, narrative, and beauty. All of these things that are intrinsically good could be put onto someone’s “list”, with a major emphasis being put on the wellbeing of that person. Almost taking a utilitarianism approach of good equal’s wellbeing. This theory is saying that a person is benefiting by having their basic needs met which ultimately in the end will produce the best result. By having their basic needs met this would give that person the chance to then further there “list” to try to include things like beauty, because they now have equality. For instance if there is a group of children living in poverty in a third world country and they are provided with the basic needs to live , food, water, shelter, this is going to enhance their life. They will then be equal; in turn they will now have the opportunity to make advancements. Looking at the list once a person’s basic needs are met they can they search to find other things in the world that bring them happiness. Going back to the utilitarianism view of good equal’s wellbeing, in this case this can be seen as true. By having their basic needs met through this object list theory, they are benefiting more greatly than applying any other theory, and they are doing so with the least amount of suffer and hardship possible.