While reading through this piece many
of the statements that were made I found very interesting and did agree with
many of the author’s ideas about ethic. Yet, there were a few points that were
made that I did not agree with. After reading the part about Why Simply obeying
the law is not sufficient there were a few things that I would have to disagree
with the authors are saying that “A concern with ethics is much more than
staying out of trouble with the law. It is a concern with living well. Simply
obeying the law is not enough” (MI 8). As I read further this argument about
the piece began to emerge. It seems that the author is saying the simply not
breaking the law is not enough and that you have to have a good moral code in
order to be an ethical person. My issue with this is that the laws are a
reflection of the moral code of a society. They were written as guide lines as
to how the citizens of a certain society should be conducting their lives, therefore
from my point of view giving them moral and ethical significance. Also looking at
the laws from different groups around the world it does give insight into the
moral codes of those societies. Looking back and even in modern society’s today
there are laws regarding how we should treat one and other and laws about
religion. I think that by following the laws that are given to you in a certain
society that is enough, and by doing this you are living well. The laws are
there as ethical and moral structures for how one should conduct their lives
within a society.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.