I found this piece very intriguing
to read. I agreed with a lot of what the author had to say but one point really
struck me. “Consider the inference from
the claim that moral codes differ from culture to culture to the conclusion
that the moral code of each culture determines what is right and wrong for the
members of that culture (i.e. morality is “internal” to each culture or
society, and thence to the claim that moral relativism should be accepted
because it fosters the admirable attitude of tolerance toward other cultures”
(15). The author goes on to point out
problems in this perspective but I couldn't help but wonder, Is it morally
justifiable to judge another culture’s moral codes based on the standards of
one’s own personal morals, or is it immoral based on the concept of cultural
relativism, which is to adopt an attitude of tolerance towards all other
cultures and morals. The example of clitorectomy is what I am referring to. To
my own personal morals, based on my upbringing, and surroundings, this would be
defined as genital mutilation, which I do not agree with. However, to the tribe, this is a normal
cultural practice. So is it moral of me
to disagree with this based on my own personal morals, or is it immoral based
on the concept of moral relativism, and if it is immoral, then doesn't that
make me an immoral person?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.