I have to agree with the point that torture should not be
legalized due to the fact that there is no guarantee that you are getting the
correct information from the person. I don’t
believe that torture should be allowed because I feel that it is similar to the
situation of whether it is moral to kill one to save five. This would be intentional killing of someone
who may or may not have the answers that the intelligence and defense agencies
are looking for. As we have seen,
intentional killing is not considered moral, where unintended would be moral. I do not think that morally we can say that
if we need information on something that may or may not happen, we can torture
someone to the point that they are willing to talk. I think that people who don’t talk are
usually willing to die for what they believe in, and if we torture them to the point
of death, and still have no answers, we are killing someone and not saving the
lives of others. I think that torture is
a big debate today because of the terrorist attacks that we have seen, and the
fear that there may be more in the future.
I think that we need to work more on having a good defense set up rather
than focusing on trying to find information out on possible attacks. I think that if we spend a lot of time trying
to find this information out, we will drive ourselves crazy chasing many empty
threats and misleading information.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.