My objection to these articles is in how they address the
attempt to ‘fix’ sex slavery. They propose bandaid solutions for a serious
social normatively driven problem. Within the Kristof article, “Stopping the Traffickers”
he advocates the following solutions, “ (1) pressure on foreign governments to
crack down on brothels with underage girls or those held against their will,
(2) promotion of condoms to keep prostitutes alive and (3) above all, literacy
and job programs to raise the status of girls and women”. By just pressuring
the government and providing contraception I feel as if not enough action is
being taken. That type of solution is not sustainable, and while important to
minimize the damage done to these girls, without proper education and social
reform the problem will perpetuate. I think that the most important of all
three of these potential solutions is number three because it can help create a
longer lasting more sustainable solution. I also would like to add that the
education cannot just end with women’s empowerment, but must also address the
corruption of the police force or the general attitude men are instilled with
to just go along with this practice. Societal education is the begging of a potentially
lasting solution. However, another point to consider lies within the Nagam
article, where a potential solution suggested is to help promote conversation
and dialogue about these issues amongst the Indian and Nepalese to adequately
address the situation from within. I think promoting a solution from within is equally
important because it adds a degree of cultural sensitivity as well as begins to
eliminate the patriarchal and dependent aid. Finding cohesion between education
and cultural sensitivity while avoiding imperialism and promoting justice should
be the difficult yet overall goal.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.